Reject the Exelon Takeover of Pepco

Ener­gy Jus­tice Net­work tes­ti­fied in D.C. against Exelon ener­gy cor­po­ra­tion’s takeover of Pep­co, elec­tric ser­vice provider to Wash­ing­ton, D.C. and Maryland. 

This takeover is a bad deal for the Dis­trict of Colum­bia and is not in the pub­lic inter­est. It would hit DC ratepay­ers with high­er elec­tric­i­ty bills, would under­mine renew­able ener­gy and would not pro­vide reli­able power.

Exelon is the nation’s largest nuclear util­i­ty, with 23 of the nation’s 99 remain­ing nuclear reac­tors. 81% of Exelon’s elec­tric­i­ty out­put in 2013 came from these 23 reac­tors. Two-thirds of them (15 of the 23) are in a list of reac­tors that are “at risk” of ear­ly retire­ment. Five of these “at risk” Exelon reac­tors have enough of these prob­lems in com­bi­na­tion that they’re said to “face par­tic­u­lar­ly intense chal­lenges.” The costs to keep unprof­itable plants run­ning means huge rate hikes for ratepay­ers. The costs of their clo­sure are even more alarm­ing, due to both the need for replace­ment pow­er as well as the astro­nom­i­cal costs of reac­tor decommissioning.
 
The U.S. Nuclear Reg­u­la­to­ry Com­mis­sion esti­mates that the cost of decom­mis­sion­ing ranges from $300 mil­lion to $400 mil­lion per reac­tor. Union of Con­cerned Sci­en­tists and the Nuclear Ener­gy Insti­tute both esti­mate that the aver­age reac­tor unit now costs about $500 mil­lion to decom­mis­sion. Actu­al decom­mis­sion­ing costs in recent years have exceed­ed $1 bil­lion per reac­tor, as evi­denced by the over $1 bil­lion price tag for decom­mis­sion­ing Exelon’s Zion reac­tor in Illi­nois and the $1.2 bil­lion price tag for decom­mis­sion­ing the Ver­mont Yan­kee reac­tor. The 2‑unit San Onofre reac­tor site in Cal­i­for­nia, closed for good in 2013, has an esti­mat­ed decom­mis­sion­ing price tag of $4.4 billion.
 
Nuclear reac­tors are NOT reli­able. A reac­tor closed down tem­porar­i­ly for repairs, or per­ma­nent­ly due to costs or unre­solv­able safe­ty issues requires sig­nif­i­cant replace­ment pow­er. Nuclear reac­tors also can­not take the heat. In the hottest sum­mer days, when demand is high­est due to air con­di­tion­er use, nuclear reac­tors increas­ing­ly have to cur­tail pow­er or close tem­porar­i­ly, as they can­not legal­ly dis­charge their heat­ed cool­ing water that they can­not ade­quate­ly cool.
 
Exelon is hos­tile to renew­able ener­gy, despite some minor invest­ments. In Mary­land, they’re start­ing to push for nuclear pow­er to be includ­ed in state Renew­able Port­fo­lio Stan­dards, which would dec­i­mate the mar­ket for wind pow­er as exist­ing nuclear facil­i­ties can name their price and under­mine new wind and solar development.
 
Nuclear pow­er is not envi­ron­men­tal­ly sound. To pro­duce the same amount of ener­gy as coal, it lays waste to more land with ura­ni­um min­ing. It con­sumes exten­sive amounts of fos­sil fuels to mine, mill, con­vert, enrich and fab­ri­cate nuclear reac­tor fuel, and trans­port long ways around the coun­try between each of these steps, before the fuel even reach­es the reac­tor. Exten­sive radioac­tive and chem­i­cal pol­lu­tion con­t­a­m­i­nates com­mu­ni­ties each step of the way, includ­ing in nuclear reac­tor com­mu­ni­ties, where radioac­tive air and water releas­es are rou­tine and legal, not to men­tion ille­gal releas­es from spills.
 
For more info, see www.powerdc.org

 


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Related Projects

Watch Us on YouTube