Plainfield, Vermont Biomass Continues to Rile Neighbors

- by Eric Blais­dell, March 27, 2015, Ver­mont Pub­lic Radio

Things got so heat­ed at Plainfield’s Select Board meet­ing Mon­day night in a dis­cus­sion about God­dard College’s planned bio­mass-fueled heat plant, that one elect­ed offi­cial told board mem­bers they’d be in “deep water” if they dis­re­gard­ed some res­i­dents’ wish­es to have anoth­er meet­ing on it.

The school is apply­ing for a 40-year Rur­al Devel­op­ment loan from the USDA that would cov­er 90 per­cent of the costs for the plant. As part of that process, it needs a let­ter of sup­port from the town.

God­dard emailed the Select Board on Thurs­day look­ing for that sup­port. Chair­man Bram Tow­bin, speak­ing for him­self, replied that the school has “mis­han­dled the com­mu­ni­ty rela­tions aspect of this project” by not telling res­i­dents what was going on since the project began. Tow­bin invit­ed some­one from God­dard to attend the board’s meet­ing Mon­day to plead its case.

Res­i­dents who live near the plant’s site have been fight­ing it every step of the way. On Town Meet­ing Day in March 2013, vot­ers reject­ed a non­bind­ing arti­cle ask­ing the col­lege to halt con­struc­tion until it could be proven the nanopar­ti­cles emit­ted would be harm­less. The debate got nasty, with neigh­bors accus­ing each oth­er of being “liars,” “losers” and “jerks.”

Res­i­dent Karen Bouf­fard had appealed to the Ver­mont Supreme Court the state Envi­ron­men­tal Court’s rul­ing in favor of the plant. The Supreme Court reject­ed the appeal in Novem­ber, cit­ing a lack of evi­dence for her claims that the plant would dam­age the aes­thet­ics of the area.

Some of those at Monday’s meet­ing were already cranky because about 20 peo­ple were try­ing to cram them­selves into the small room in the town’s munic­i­pal build­ing that the board uses for its meet­ings. Tow­bin took the blame for that, say­ing that he should have warned the meet­ing for the Town Hall.

Res­i­dents also weren’t hap­py that God­dard didn’t send some­one from the school. Instead, it sent Tim Mak­er, the CEO and pres­i­dent of Mont­pe­lier-based Com­mu­ni­ty Bio­mass Sys­tems Inc. The com­pa­ny has been act­ing as project man­ag­er for the plant since 2011.

 “The pres­i­dent [of God­dard, Bob Ken­ny] asked me to rep­re­sent the project in the terms of this doc­u­ment, which is about a loan appli­ca­tion,” Mak­er said. “As far as any infor­ma­tion that went to the col­lege and went to me, this meet­ing was sim­ply about the sig­na­ture of this document.”

The board looked poised to pro­vide just that, with two of the three mem­bers, David Strong and Bet­sy Ziegler, voic­ing their sup­port of the project. Tow­bin and some res­i­dents, how­ev­er, weren’t ready to give their support.

Tow­bin acknowl­edged that the town’s Devel­op­ment Review Board had approved the plant, the state has signed off on it, the col­lege has been suc­cess­ful in lit­i­ga­tion and the town plan talks about sup­port­ing renew­able resources.

“In that lens, I think there is an argu­ment to be made that the town should sup­port the project,” Tow­bin said. “My con­cern is on a dif­fer­ent lev­el. It’s a lit­tle eso­teric, but very impor­tant. It’s on the issue of com­mu­ni­ca­tion and over­all neigh­bor­li­ness. From the town’s point of view, there has been a prob­lem in terms of com­mu­ni­cat­ing with var­i­ous par­ties with­in the town that has cre­at­ed a great deal of animosity.”

Bouf­fard gave the board a peti­tion with 78 sig­na­tures that she said were from Plain­field res­i­dents who do not sup­port the plant. She said she col­lect­ed the sig­na­tures in three days.

 “What­ev­er per­cent­age of the vot­ers in the town, I think that’s sig­nif­i­cant,” she said. As of Town Meet­ing Day, Plain­field had 893 reg­is­tered voters.

George Cush­ing, the town’s con­sta­ble and col­lec­tor of delin­quent tax­es, said the issue appeared to be a hot top­ic and that maybe anoth­er meet­ing would be pru­dent if the doc­u­ment didn’t need to be signed right away. Mak­er said the USDA has not been clear about the deadline.

Bob Atchin­son, the town’s ener­gy coor­di­na­tor, didn’t think anoth­er meet­ing was necessary.

“Isn’t it up to the Select Board whether or not to sign this? If the Select Board feels that in their wis­dom you don’t have enough infor­ma­tion to sign it, then that’s your pre­rog­a­tive,” Atchin­son said.

Tow­bin said he’s look­ing to the com­mu­ni­ty for guid­ance and would hold anoth­er meet­ing if res­i­dents want it.

Strong said he was will­ing to have anoth­er meet­ing but was ready to sign the document.

“I think the oppo­nents are the neigh­bors who are most affect­ed by (the plant),” Strong said. “But I don’t think they rep­re­sent the com­mu­ni­ty as a whole, and I don’t know whether a sec­ond meet­ing would gen­er­ate any addi­tion­al information.”

Strong said he got the sense from Towbin’s com­ments that no amount of infor­ma­tion is going to change his mind on this issue. He said Tow­bin has done a good job of crit­i­ciz­ing the col­lege about its lack of com­mu­ni­ca­tion, but that’s not what sign­ing the doc­u­ment is about.

“At this point, you’ve got to decide whether this is a mer­i­to­ri­ous project, it’s good for the town,” Strong said. “That’s real­ly what we’re being asked.”

Tow­bin said he was sim­ply explain­ing the his­to­ry of the sit­u­a­tion and that God­dard is ask­ing the town for a favor.

Strong reit­er­at­ed that the deci­sion was up to the Select Board, not the res­i­dents. That didn’t sit well with Cushing.

“You are elect­ed offi­cials,” he said. “This group of peo­ple would not be here if they did not have a ques­tion of sup­port. And because you are elect­ed offi­cials, you real­ly are man­dat­ed to fol­low the peo­ple because we elect you. And I don’t think that hav­ing anoth­er meet­ing is out of line. I don’t think you three peo­ple should be mak­ing this deci­sion, boom, like that. I think you’re going to be in deep water, way over your head if you do.”

The board decid­ed to table the dis­cus­sion until its next meet­ing April 6 at 7 p.m. at the Town Hall.

Saman­tha Kol­ber, Goddard’s com­mu­ni­ca­tions man­ag­er, said Tues­day that Mak­er would be at that meet­ing. The pres­i­dent will make an effort to be there, she said, but if Ken­ny can’t make it, some­one from the school’s staff will attend.


Posted

in

by


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Related Projects

Watch Us on YouTube