California Lawsuit Seeks Pollution Cuts From Massive Tree-burning Power Plant

- by Kevin Bundy, August 22, 2014, Cen­ter for Bio­log­i­cal Diversity

The Cen­ter for Bio­log­i­cal Diver­si­ty filed a law­suit today chal­leng­ing a Clean Air Act per­mit issued by the Envi­ron­men­tal Pro­tec­tion Agency for a mas­sive, 31-megawatt bio­mass pow­er plant pro­posed by Sier­ra Pacif­ic Indus­tries in Ander­son, Calif. The chal­lenge, filed direct­ly in the 9th Cir­cuit U.S. Court of Appeals, charges the EPA with fail­ing to con­trol cli­mate-warm­ing car­bon diox­ide pol­lu­tion from the plant.

“Tree-burn­ing pow­er plants foul the air, dam­age the cli­mate, and threat­en our forests,” said Kevin Bundy, a senior attor­ney with the Center’s Cli­mate Law Insti­tute. “For too long the EPA has act­ed as if car­bon pol­lu­tion from bio­mass doesn’t exist. But you can’t fool the atmos­phere. Car­bon from burn­ing trees still warms the climate.”

The Clean Air Act requires the “best avail­able con­trol tech­nol­o­gy” for car­bon pol­lu­tion from large facil­i­ties like the Ander­son plant. The EPA’s per­mit, how­ev­er, treat­ed bio­mass com­bus­tion itself as a “con­trol tech­nol­o­gy” — even though the facil­i­ty is pri­mar­i­ly designed to burn biomass.

“The EPA’s deci­sion makes no sense,” Bundy said. “You can’t con­trol the pol­lu­tion from burn­ing trees by burn­ing trees, any more than you can con­trol the pol­lu­tion from burn­ing coal by burn­ing coal.”

The EPA’s per­mit also failed to con­sid­er whether the facil­i­ty should be lim­it­ed to less car­bon-inten­sive fuels — such as amply avail­able mill waste — rather than being allowed to burn whole trees.

Burn­ing wood for pow­er releas­es about three times as much car­bon diox­ide per megawatt-hour as nat­ur­al gas and is even more car­bon-inten­sive than coal. Depend­ing on the mate­r­i­al, bio­mass pow­er gen­er­a­tion can increase atmos­pher­ic car­bon diox­ide con­cen­tra­tions for decades or cen­turies com­pared to what oth­er­wise would have hap­pened to the material.

Burn­ing whole trees that oth­er­wise would have been left to grow in the for­est, for exam­ple, can increase cli­mate pol­lu­tion for many years, even if the pow­er gen­er­at­ed replaces reliance on fos­sil fuels.

“Bio­mass is tout­ed as a clean, green and renew­able source of ener­gy, but the real­i­ty on the ground and in the air is dif­fer­ent,” Bundy said. “The EPA can’t give these inef­fi­cient, dirty facil­i­ties a free pass on car­bon pollution.”

The case is titled Cen­ter for Bio­log­i­cal Diver­si­ty v. EPA. The Cen­ter is rep­re­sent­ed by attor­neys Kevin Bundy and Bren­dan Cummings.


EJ Communities Map

Map of Coal and Gas Facilities

We are mapping all of the existing, proposed, closed and defeated dirty energy and waste facilities in the US. We are building a network of community groups to fight the facilities and the corporations behind them.

Related Projects

Watch Us on YouTube